Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42919967›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2026

Interneurons and network activity in the cerebral cortex: a developmental dialogue.

Monika Moissidis, Oscar Marín

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Monika MoissidisCentre for Developmental Neurobiology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Oscar MarínCentre for Developmental Neurobiology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK. oscar.marin@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6264-7027

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mammalian cerebral cortex undergoes profound functional changes during early postnatal development. During this period, neurons generate spontaneous electrical activity long before sensory experience, coordinating into distinct patterns of synchronous activity. Traditionally, neuronal activity has been viewed as instructing interneuron development by modulating transcriptional programmes, morphology and connectivity. However, accumulating evidence in rodents reveals that this relationship is bidirectional: cortical interneurons are not merely passive recipients of activity-dependent signals but also active architects of developing network dynamics. They regulate spontaneous activity transitions from gap-junction-mediated synchronous events to large, synaptically driven bursts, and later to sparse firing characteristic of mature circuits. Critically, different interneuron subtypes mature at distinct timelines and orchestrate transitions in network activity. Activity-dependent mechanisms, in turn, regulate interneuron wiring, programmed cell death, diversification and terminal differentiation. This reciprocal dialogue between interneurons and network activity is essential for establishing functional cortical circuits.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.