ArticleArchives of toxicology2026
Population-specific transcriptomic bioactivity assessment of perfluorooctanoic acid using human liver spheroids and physiologically based toxicokinetic modeling.
Article in Archives of toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) has been widely used in industrial and consumer products and was recently classified as a Group 1 carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer. However, uncertainties remain regarding transcriptomic bioactivity thresholds associated with liver effects and their variability across clinically relevant populations. In this study, previously published transcriptomic data obtained following 24-h and 10-day exposure of primary human liver spheroids (LS) to PFOA were integrated into a physiologically based toxicokinetic (PBTK), population-specific framework to estimate transcriptomic human equivalent doses (HEDs). In addition, exploratory concordance analysis was performed between PFOA-responsive genes and liver hepatocellular carcinoma (LIHC)-associated transcriptomic profiles. Median transcriptomic HEDs ranged from 283 to 412 µg/kg body weight (bw)/week and were substantially higher than the estimated HEDs corresponding to the 95th percentile serum PFOA concentration in the U.S. population (0.0099 µg/kg bw/week) and the mean PFOA concentrations reported in human liver tissue samples (0.035 µg/kg bw/week). Obesity class III, cirrhosis Child-Pugh classes A and B, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease reduced transcriptomic HEDs by approximately 31-41% compared with the healthy population, although HEDs remained substantially above reference values. Gene-level analysis identified only a limited number of genes within the bioactivity exposure ratio range of 1-100. More than 50% of PFOA-responsive genes exhibited concordant expression patterns with LIHC-associated transcriptomic profiles. Although the biological significance of these overlaps remains uncertain, concordance significantly exceeded that expected by chance from a background gene set and was driven mainly by down-regulated genes. Overall, this study provides a population-informed framework for integrating transcriptomic bioactivity data with PBTK modeling in human-relevant assessment of PFOA-associated liver effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42919935What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.