ArticleDie Anaesthesiologie2026
[Postgraduate training in anesthesiology in Germany : Challenges and perspectives].
Article in Die Anaesthesiologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPostgraduate medical training in anesthesiology in Germany faces a variety of challenges, including high competency requirements, staffing shortages, the implementation of competence-based training programs and the potential long-term effects of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic.
methodsThis secondary analysis focuses on the German subgroup of a survey conducted by the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC), as reported by Dow et al. Using descriptive statistics, the study analyzed training conditions, supervision, workload, pandemic-related impacts on training and the consideration of work abroad and examined these factors within a European context.
resultsA total of 140 doctors in training from Germany completed the questionnaire. Although the results largely align with European trends, only a comparatively small proportion of respondents (38%) reported receiving adequate supervision. With a median of 50 working hours per week and regular overtime, the workload is high and 37% reported considering working abroad. Whilst the majority reported no significant pandemic-related disruption to their training, a substantial minority reported restrictions on acquiring practical skills or a lack of opportunities to catch up on missed content. DISCUSSION: The findings underscore the need for improved supervision, competence-based training concepts, and adequate staffing. Coordinated measures by all relevant stakeholders, from hospital management to professional societies, appear necessary to improve the training and working conditions associated with the consideration of working abroad.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42919919What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.