ArticleNature biomedical engineering2026
Gradient-driven microfluidic framework for the screening of ratiometric drug combinations towards precision oncology in paediatric leukaemia.
Article in Nature biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Improving outcomes for high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) patients requires increasingly personalized treatment strategies that leverage molecular and omics-based assays as well as functional screens. However, to date, only a few of these approaches are clinically actionable and easily adopted in clinical settings. To that end, we report a combination drug screening assay (GradientScreen) that correlates with clinical outcomes using standard paediatric ALL treatment protocols. This assay uses a microfluidic device to generate overlapping drug gradients and implements an analysis framework that characterizes drug synergy and efficacy in a ratiometric manner. Using partial least squares regression, we show that our combination response metrics correlate with both minimal residual disease (MRD) following initiation of treatment and later clinical end-points. Here, we further demonstrate that this system could be used to evaluate response to experimental therapeutic regimens in patients who did not respond to standard treatment. This assay can serve as a research-enabling tool for the field, with potential to integrate into clinical pathology workflows to identify difficult-to-treat ALL patients and screen for alternative treatment strategies at diagnosis.
Identifiers
42919908What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.