Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42919840›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Global-scale variability of glacier velocity and mass loss across terminus environments.

Joseph Mallalieu, Jonathan L Carrivick, Matthias Huss, Iestyn D Barr, Nicholas E Barrand, Cassandra L Raby

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joseph MallalieuSchool of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. j.mallalieu@bham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1988-8594
Jonathan L CarrivickSchool of Geography and water@leeds, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9286-5348
Matthias HussLaboratory of Hydraulics, Hydrology and Glaciology (VAW), ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Iestyn D BarrDepartment of Natural Sciences, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9066-8738
Nicholas E BarrandSchool of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4428-1863
Cassandra L RabySchool of Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Funding

Leverhulme Trust RPG-2019-093
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The environment in which a glacier terminates can strongly influence its behaviour, stability and future evolution, yet the relationship between terminus type and glacier dynamics at the global scale remains poorly constrained. Here we present a globally-complete classification of glacier termini distinguishing between land, lake, marine and shelf environments, and integrate it with datasets of glacier geometry, dynamics and climate. We show that although lake-, marine- and shelf-terminating glaciers comprise only 3.2% of glaciers globally, they account for over half of global glacier area and mass loss. We also show that lake- and marine-terminating glaciers flow, on average, 10% and 44% faster than land-terminating glaciers, respectively. Furthermore, specific (area-normalised) mass loss rates at lake-terminating glaciers are 57% greater than those at land- and marine-terminating glaciers. Our findings underscore the need for improved representation of non-land glacier termini in models of glacier evolution and sea-level rise, and suggest that distinguishing the environmental and geometric controls of termini on glacier dynamics remains an important challenge for future research.

Identifiers

PMID42919840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.