ReviewBone marrow transplantation2026
How could calreticulin-targeting therapies change the myelofibrosis transplant paradigm?
Review in Bone marrow transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myelofibrosis (MF), the most severe Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm, is driven by mutations in JAK2, CALR, or MPL, with CALR mutations accounting for 30-35% of cases. Mutant CALR forms an aberrant complex with the thrombopoietin receptor, resulting in constitutive JAK-STAT signalling and is expressed on the malignant cell surface as a tumour-specific neoantigen absent from normal tissues, making it an attractive therapeutic target. Allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains the only curative treatment but is limited to selected patients with adequate fitness and a suitable donor. This review summarises the rapidly evolving landscape of CALR-directed therapies, including peptide vaccines, the Fc-silenced monoclonal antibody INCA033989, bispecific T-cell engagers, antibody-drug conjugates, and the CAR T-cell therapy RPG4, and explores their potential impact on transplant decision-making. INCA033989 has generated the most mature clinical data, demonstrating improvements in splenomegaly, constitutional symptoms, anaemia and early markers of disease modification, whereas cytotoxic approaches such as CAR T-cell therapy offer the prospect of deeper clonal eradication. Collectively, these therapies have the potential to redefine the role and timing of allo-HCT and expand treatment opportunities in the peri-transplant setting, including the targeted eradication of measurable residual disease following transplantation.
Identifiers
42919838What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.