Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42919415›Full record

SynthesisCritical care (London, England)2026

Clinical prediction models in cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Pablo Lasa-Berasain, Amaia Torrecilla Ugarte, Raúl Juárez-Vela, Berta Ibánez-Beróiz, Aitor Ansotegui Hernández, Rafael Sádaba, Julio Barado Hualde

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Critical care (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pablo Lasa-BerasainDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Reina Sofia Hospital, Tudela, Navarre, Spain. palasa95@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5127-5181
Amaia Torrecilla UgarteDepartment of Internal Medicine, Garcia Orcoyen Hospital, Estella, Navarre, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-1447-2629
Raúl Juárez-VelaFaculty of Health Sciences, GRUPAC Research Group, University of La Rioja, La Rioja, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3597-2048
Berta Ibánez-BeróizMethodology Unit, Navarrabiomed-UPNA, Navarre, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7797-4845
Aitor Ansotegui HernándezDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Navarre, Pamplona, Navarre, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-4176-4079
Rafael SádabaPublic University of Navarre (UPNA), Pamplona, Navarre, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3776-4744
Julio Barado HualdePublic University of Navarre (UPNA), Pamplona, Navarre, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0324-8023

Funding

Gobierno de Navarra Gº41/24
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury (CSA-AKI) is a frequent postoperative complication associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Clinical prediction models (CPM) may identify high-risk patients enabling targeted preventive interventions and improved outcomes. The objective of the study was to identify available CPMs for the risk of developing CSA-AKI and summarize their performance.

methodsA systematic search of studies published in Pubmed, Scopus, the Chocrane Library and Web of Science was conducted, including studies that developed or validated CPMs for CSA-AKI in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers. Summary measures of diagnostic performance were calculated when feasible using random-effects models. Calibration and sensitivity analyses were also performed.

resultsThe pooled incidence of CSA-AKI was 26.3% (95% CI, 26.0-26.4), whereas CSA-AKI requiring renal replacement therapy (CSA-AKI RRT) occurred in 2.2% of patients (95% CI, 2.1-2.2). Among validated CPMs, Thakar 2005 demonstrated the best predictive performance for CSA-AKI RRT: pooled AUC 0.80 (95% CI, 0.77-0.82), sensitivity of 0.87, and a specificity of 0.49 at a threshold of ≥ 3 points. Calibration analyses indicated underestimation of risk. The Mehta 2006 and Wijeysundera 2007 models also demonstrated good discrimination. Discrimination for the prediction of milder stages of CSA-AKI was poorer, but newer models such as the Demirjian 2022 model showed promising performance.

conclusionAccurate and well-validated CPMs can facilitate risk stratification for CSA-AKI which can influence clinical practice and research. Thakar 2005 demonstrated very good discrimination for predicting CSA-AKI RRT, whereas more validation studies for the prediction of milder stages of CSA-AKI are warranted.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryCardiac Surgical ProceduresHumansPostoperative ComplicationsPrediction AlgorithmsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsAcute kidney injuryCardiac surgeryClinical prediction modelsMeta-analysisRisk prediction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.