Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42919390›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2026

Improving the detection, assessment, management and prevention of delirium in palliative care units (the DAMPen-Delirium II study): protocol for an implementation-to-target Type III hybrid effectiveness-implementation cluster randomised-controlled trial, economic evaluation and process evaluation of the Creating Learning Environments for Compassionate Care-Palliative (CLECC-Pal) implementation strategy.

Gillian Jackson, Grant Constable, Bronwen Williams, Judith Cohen, Chao Huang, Julie Halliwell, Helen Roberts, Daniel Harman, Paul Taylor, Peter May and 6 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Gillian JacksonWolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK.
Grant ConstableHull Health Trials Unit, University of Hull, Hull, UK.
Bronwen WilliamsHull Health Trials Unit, University of Hull, Hull, UK.
Judith CohenHull Health Trials Unit, University of Hull, Hull, UK.
Chao HuangInstitute of Clinical & Applied Health Research, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK.
Julie HalliwellPublic Co-investigator and Chair of Public Advisory Group, Manchester, UK.
Helen RobertsInstitute of Clinical & Applied Health Research, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK.
Daniel HarmanCity Health Care Partnership CIC, Hull, UK.
Paul TaylorSchool of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Peter MayCicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, Kings College London, London, UK.
Alicia O'CathainSchool of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Annmarie HosieThe University of Notre Dame, Darlinghurst, Sydney, Australia.
Meera AgarUniversity of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Miriam JohnsonWolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK.
Fliss E M MurtaghWolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK.
Mark PearsonWolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK. mark.pearson@hyms.ac.uk.

Funding

National Institute of Health and Care Research NIHR161360
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDelirium affects up to two-thirds of palliative care unit (PCU) inpatients, causing distress for patients, families, and staff, and contributing to complex care needs and increased healthcare resource use. Although evidence-based guidelines exist, their consistent implementation in PCUs is limited, and implementation strategies to support guideline-adherent care have not been rigorously evaluated in this setting. Creating Learning Environments for Compassionate Care-Palliative Delirium (CLECC-Pal Delirium) is a co-designed multi-component implementation strategy to help embed guideline-adherent delirium care within routine PCU practice. This cluster randomised controlled trial (cRCT) evaluates the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the implementation strategy using an implementation-to-target design, with embedded economic and process evaluations.

methodsAdaptive implementation-to-target, Type III hybrid effectiveness-implementation parallel group cRCT across 20 PCUs (10 per arm, ~ 50 patient records per cluster at each timepoint) in the UK, randomised 1:1 to CLECC-Pal Delirium or usual care. Randomisation is stratified by unit size, education provision, and provider type (NHS/Charity). Sites will receive tailored support to achieve predefined implementation-readiness criteria prior to data collection. The primary outcome is the proportion of each admission's inpatient days affected by delirium (delirium days), measured retrospectively using a validated chart-based method adapted for palliative care. Secondary outcomes include adherence to delirium care guidelines, patient symptom burden, functional status, and incremental cost-effectiveness. The sample size (1200 admission episodes with delirium) provides 92.3% power to detect a 12% absolute reduction in delirium days, based on an assumed intracluster correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.03 (α = 0.05). Mixed-effects regression models, with clustering at the PCU level, will be employed to analyse the primary outcome, adjusting for stratification factors and other prespecified covariates, and conducted on an intention-to-treat basis. Blinded statisticians and health economists will conduct analyses. The process evaluation, guided by Normalisation Process Theory, will examine implementation fidelity and how, why, and in what contexts the strategy is integrated into practice. DISCUSSION: This trial will provide evidence on the clinical- and cost-effectiveness of an implementation strategy to improve delirium care in PCUs, strengthening the implementation evidence base in a setting where implementation research is limited.

trial registrationISRCTN23678136; registered 14th April 2025.

Indexed as

DeliriumPalliative CareCost-Benefit AnalysisCost-Effectiveness AnalysisGuideline AdherenceHumansImplementation ScienceRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCost-benefit analysisDeliriumGuideline adherenceHospicesPalliative care

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.