ArticleBMC veterinary research2026
An offline deep learning model for bovine muzzle identification using the variance of the laplacian, YOLOv8, EfficientNetV2-S, and ArcFace.
Article in BMC veterinary research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Precise animal identification underpins livestock management, disease control, and traceability. Traditional methods such as tattoos and ear tags can fade or be lost, motivating a shift toward biometric-based systems. This study proposed an offline Python-based deep learning biometric identification model for bovine using muzzle images. YOLOv8 detected and cropped the muzzle region, EfficientNetV2-S architecture was integrated with ArcFace (angular margin loss) for muzzle pattern extraction and matching. The model was evaluated under two conditions: a controlled dataset (Kaggle) and a preliminary, small-scale field dataset using smartphone-acquired images from smallholder farmers. The model was validated using the Kaggle dataset and tested on both Kaggle and field-collected muzzle images. Model performance was evaluated using the cosine similarity score, processing time, F1 score, recall, accuracy, and precision. The model showed shorter processing times and higher recognition performance on the Kaggle images than on the field images. A domain gap was observed between Kaggle dataset and field dataset. The current model is a controlled prototype with preliminary field testing for offline muzzle recognition; however, it has not yet met pre-defined field readiness measures. Overall, the proposed offline muzzle biometric model provides a non-invasive prototype for bovine identification under the tested conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42919369What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.