ReviewContraception and reproductive medicine2026
Beyond women's burden: integrating male partners into contraceptive decision-making.
Review in Contraception and reproductive medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundContraceptive use and family planning have traditionally been viewed as women's responsibility, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Despite growing evidence highlighting the positive impact of male involvement in improving contraceptive uptake, continuation, and reproductive health outcomes, the participation of male partners remains limited. This review explores the critical role of male partners in contraceptive decision-making and synthesizes current evidence on the barriers impeding their participation. It further identifies strategies and interventions to foster shared responsibility in family planning and promote equitable reproductive health practices.
methodsA narrative review approach was adopted to collate global and regional evidence from peer-reviewed literature, policy reports, and relevant case studies. The review is structured around five core themes: sociocultural and gender norms, knowledge and educational barriers, limitations within healthcare systems, misconceptions around male contraceptive methods, and systemic challenges to implementation. The review also presents innovative, context-sensitive strategies for male engagement and future directions to enhance male participation in family planning.
resultsThe analysis reveals that male involvement remains suboptimal due to persistent patriarchal norms, misinformation, stigma, and limited access to male-centric contraceptive options. Existing family planning programs often lack couple-focused counseling and fail to provide inclusive services for men. However, interventions such as couple-based education, male-friendly clinics, community advocacy, gamified digital tools, and AI-enabled reproductive health platforms show promise in shifting attitudes and improving engagement. Success stories from countries including Tanzania, Vietnam, and India provide evidence for scalable, culturally adaptive models that facilitate male involvement.
conclusionStrengthening male participation is pivotal for achieving equitable reproductive health outcomes. Multi-level strategies, such as spanning education, service delivery, community norms, and policy integration, are essential to promote shared responsibility. Addressing systemic barriers, expanding male contraceptive choices, and leveraging technology can catalyze behavioral change and contribute to more inclusive, effective, and sustainable family planning programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42919363What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.