ArticleImplementation science communications2026
Adapting the Fiscal Mapping Process to improve the financial sustainability of implementation support and mental health delivery organizations: protocol for a mixed methods study.
Article in Implementation science communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSustainability of evidence-based mental health intervention (EBI) implementation is a challenge to increasing access to mental health services. Funding is a common barrier to sustainment. EBIs, while cost effective, are expensive to implement. The Fiscal Mapping Process is a strategic planning tool designed for behavioral health agencies to plan the financial sustainment of specific EBIs. Financial planning at an organizational level is also required to enable implementation support organizations (ISOs) and mental health delivery organizations (MHDOs) to sustainably operate. Project FISCAL (Financing Implementation for Sustainable Care, Access, and Localization) will adapt the Fiscal Mapping Process for ISOs/MHDOs to plan for financial sustainability while balancing access and high-quality mental health care.
methodsThe study will be guided by the Discover, Design/Build, and Test human-centered design framework. ISOs will include intermediary and purveyor organizations, and MHDOs will include provider and digital mental health organizations. In the Discover Phase (Aim 1), we will identify ISOs'/MHDOs' needs for a strategic financial planning tool through process mapping and a semi-structured qualitative interview. Process mapping also will identify how ISOs/MHDOs selected financing strategies for their organization. In the Design/Build Phase (Aim 2), we will refine the Fiscal Mapping Process using Design Charrettes. In the Test Phase (Aim 3), we will assess the preliminary impact and usability of the Fiscal Mapping Process for ISOs'/MHDOs' financial sustainability using a comparative case study design. Participants in Aims 1-3 will include individuals working in ISOs/MHDOs (n = 20 ISOs/MHDOs per aim) and in Aims 1-2 also will include 5 ISO/MHDO advisors. Data will be analyzed using a convergent mixed methods approach integrating qualitative and quantitative data. DISCUSSION: The adapted Fiscal Mapping Process created in this project will help organizations with strategic financial planning to broadly sustain and scale access to effective mental health treatments. The study addresses two understudied areas of implementation science: sustainability and organizational-level financing strategies. Without careful consideration, ISOs'/MHDOs' business models could unintentionally decrease access to care for some individuals if funding is prioritized or if only certain patient populations are reached.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42919361What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.