Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42919332›Full record

ArticleMovement ecology2026

The immediate social environment dynamically shapes movement and foraging in wild Sumatran orangutans (Pongo abelii).

Emma Lokuciejewski, Margaret Crofoot, Maria van Noordwijk, Odd Jacobson, Fitriah Basalamah, Sri Suci Utami Atmoko, Caroline Schuppli

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Movement ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emma LokuciejewskiDevelopment and Evolution of Cognition, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, Konstanz, Germany. elokuciejewski@ab.mpg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2859-5822
Margaret CrofootDepartment of Biology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Maria van NoordwijkComparative Socioecology Group, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, Konstanz, Germany.
Odd JacobsonDepartment of the Ecology of Animal Societies, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, Konstanz, Germany.
Fitriah BasalamahFaculty of Biology and Agriculture, Universitas Nasional, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Sri Suci Utami AtmokoFaculty of Biology and Agriculture, Universitas Nasional, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Caroline SchuppliDevelopment and Evolution of Cognition, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, Konstanz, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial associations have well-established costs and benefits, and likely play a fundamental role in shaping animals' movement. Individuals are predicted to balance the costs of associating, such as feeding competition, against key benefits, including social learning and mating opportunities, resulting in context-dependent movement patterns. However, the effects of the immediate social environment on movement remain poorly understood, likely because most movement ecology research focusses on either strictly group-living or solitary species. We investigate how social associations shape fine-scale movement patterns and food resource exploitation in wild, semi-solitary Sumatran orangutans (Pongo abelii) who show fission-fusion social dynamics. We integrated 16 years of spatial data on 72 individuals with detailed behavioural observations. We predicted that associations shape movement in ways that reflect distinct costs and benefits across age-sex classes.

methodsWe quantified the effects of associations on daily path length (a proxy for energetic investment in movement) using a continuous-time speed and distance (CTSD) approach, path sinuosity (as a measure of movement efficiency), and the use of key food hotspots (as an indicator of feeding competition and spatial knowledge). Using linear mixed models, we tested how these metrics varied with time spent in association and age-sex class, controlling for ecological factors.

resultsAcross all age-sex classes, daily path length increased with time in association, driven by longer active periods. At the population level, there was a trend towards straighter paths when individuals were with associates, though this depended on the class of the focal and the associate. Foraging behaviour was socially sensitive, with all age-sex classes visiting fewer feeding hotspots when in associations, and spending less time feeding within them. Social influences on movement and foraging were most apparent in mothers, although flanged males also exhibited significant behavioural effects, including the greatest reduction in overall feeding time when in the presence of unflanged males compared to when alone.

conclusionsTogether, these results suggest that social associations entail costs and benefits for orangutans that are tangibly reflected in their movement and foraging decisions. Furthermore, different age-sex classes showed distinct adjustments in movement depending on who they associated with, highlighting the dynamic nature of social influences on behaviour.

Indexed as

Costs and benefits of associationsDaily path lengthFission-fusion dynamicsForaging behaviourMovement patternsSinuositySpatial ecology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.