ReviewOrphanet journal of rare diseases2026
The new frontier of newborn screening: integrating genomics, metabolomics, and data science for inborn errors of metabolism.
Review in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Newborn screening (NBS) for inborn errors of metabolism (IEMs) represents one of the most successful public health initiatives of the past century. Originating with the simple bacterial inhibition assay for phenylketonuria, the field was revolutionized by tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS). Today, we stand at the precipice of a second, more profound revolution driven by the convergence of high-throughput genomics, next-generation metabolomics, and advanced data science. This review articulates this paradigm shift, detailing how MS/MS is being augmented by targeted DNA analysis and how whole genome sequencing and untargeted metabolomics, integrated with artificial intelligence, are expanding the detectable universe of disorders and enabling precision interventions. However, this powerful multi-omic approach raises critical challenges: incomplete penetrance, overdiagnosis, economic burden, psychosocial impacts, algorithm biases, and the genomic data gap that exacerbates health disparities. We critically examine the practical limitations of AI, the lack of evidence for cost-effectiveness, the slow pace of database updates, and the need for short-term reanalysis systems to "rescue" cases left undiagnosed. Global policy variations and data-sharing governance frameworks are also addressed. We conclude that the future of NBS lies not in sequential technology replacement, but in the responsible creation of a sophisticated, multi-omic biomedical information system to transform NBS into a foundational pillar of precision pediatric medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42919311What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.