ArticleBMC ophthalmology2026
Glass intraocular foreign body removal assisted by biological amniotic membrane: a case report.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe extraction of large, sharp-edged nonmagnetic intraocular foreign bodies carries risks of iatrogenic retinal injury with conventional instruments. Biological amniotic membrane is known to be safe for intraocular use, but its application as a protective wrap to remove a foreign body has not been reported to our knowledge. We describe this novel approach. CASE PRESENTATION: A man in his forties presented with blurred vision and a retained intraocular glass fragment (5 × 3 × 1 mm) in the left eye, with visual acuity of 20/32. During vitrectomy, attempts to mobilize the sharp fragment using viscoelastic or perfluorocarbon liquid failed. A piece of hydrated biological amniotic membrane (8 × 10 mm) was therefore placed on the adjacent retina. The fragment was maneuvered onto the membrane, which was then folded to envelop it. The wrapped complex was lifted into the anterior chamber. The membrane was removed first, and then the foreign body was extracted through an enlarged corneal incision. Postoperatively, visual acuity remained 20/32, with no retinal complications.
conclusionsThis case suggests that amniotic membrane could theoretically serve as a customizable, protective wrap, potentially safeguarding the retina, increasing stability by engaging sharp edges, and eliminating the need for a snare. This approach may reduce operative time and offers a promising alternative for selected complex intraocular foreign bodies, warranting further evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42919302What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.