ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2026
Health and social challenges faced by rare disease patients in Hong Kong: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLiterature suggests that rare disease (RD) have adverse effects on patients' physical and psychosocial well-being. RD patients also face various challenges in their daily lives. This study aims to quantify the impact of RDs on patients in Hong Kong in terms of their sociodemographic characteristics, health-related conditions, patient experience, psychosocial support, illness perception, and self-esteem.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey of RD patients in Hong Kong. A mixed-mode survey approach, which included purposive, opportunity, and snowball sampling, was adopted. Participants were recruited through Rare Disease Hong Kong (RDHK) and completed a face-to-face, interviewer-administered survey(n = 176). The 127-item survey instrument covered aspects on sociodemographic characteristics, health-related conditions, patient experience, psychosocial support, illness perception, and self-esteem. Health-related quality of life (HRQL) was assessed using 12-item Short-Form Health Survey version 2 (SF-12 v2), from which a Physical Component Summary was derived for physical health, and a Mental Component Summary for psychological health. Univariate analyses and multivariate linear regression analyses were conducted subsequently to examine the associations between HRQL and sample characteristics.
resultsRD patients in this study were found to have poor physical and psychological HRQL compared with population norms. They also faced challenges and difficulties in their daily lives, including but not limited to economic activities, ability to work, sleep quality, activities of daily living, patient experience, psychosocial support, outlook on life, and self-esteem.
conclusionsTo our knowledge, this is the first study in Hong Kong that quantifies the impact of RDs on patients' HRQL, and their experience throughout the disease journey. Due to the multi-faceted impact of RD on their patients, we opine that it is critical to adopt a capability approach that does not merely emphasize on the resourcist right and entitlement of the patients, but also ensures equality in capabilities in converting resources to outcomes they value by focusing on the social determinants of health beyond healthcare policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42919294What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.