SynthesisBMC pediatrics2026
Geographic and genomic determinants of antimicrobial resistance in indian children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAntimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a major public health challenge, especially in the pediatric population in low- and middle-income countries, particularly India, where the burden of pediatric infections is high. However, nationally representative, pediatric-specific estimates of AMR with geographic stratification remain lacking. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to define the magnitude and regional variation of AMR among Indian children.
methodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance with PRISMA 2020 and the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to December 2025 for studies reporting antimicrobial resistance in bacterial isolates from children (≤ 18 years) in India. Given substantial clinical and methodological heterogeneity across pathogens, antibiotic classes, and settings, we conducted stratified random-effects meta-analyses by geographic zone for key resistance phenotypes.
resultsForty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria, of which 23 contributed to the quantitative synthesis. Pronounced geographic heterogeneity in AMR was observed across India. The number of studies contributing to each pooled estimate ranged from 2 to 8, and heterogeneity (I²) ranged from 19% to 79%. Carbapenem resistance among neonatal intensive care unit isolates ranged from 12% (95% CI 8-18) in Central India to 80% (70-88) in North India. Extended-spectrum β-lactamase production was consistently high (60-80%) across most regions, but lower in Central India (38%). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus prevalence ranged from 35% (26-44) to 61% (49-72). Fluoroquinolone resistance exceeded 85% in North, South, and East/Northeast regions, whereas colistin resistance remained ≤ 8% nationally. Genomic data demonstrated widespread dissemination of blaCTX-M-15 and regional clustering of carbapenemase genes (blaNDM, blaOXA), supporting both clonal spread and horizontal gene transfer.
conclusionAntimicrobial resistance in Indian children is highly prevalent and geographically heterogeneous, with up to five-fold regional differences in carbapenem resistance. In high-burden regions, these resistance levels are likely to compromise the effectiveness of standard empirical therapies, particularly in neonatal and critical care settings. These findings support the urgent need for region-specific empirical treatment guidelines, pediatric-focused antimicrobial stewardship, and integrated phenotypic-genomic surveillance systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42919271What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.