ArticleBMC health services research2026
Questioning the cost of convenience: a mixed methods study of the impact of a telehealth service delivery on pharmacists' work.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTelehealth represents a fundamental change to the health care delivery process. Despite the burgeoning literature on the rapid expansion of telehealth services during the COVID-19 pandemic, the consequences of these changes for clinicians' workload are seldom examined. This study addresses that gap by describing the interactions between patient activity, work processes and pharmacists' experience of an Australian hospital outpatient telepharmacy service that was rapidly upscaled during the pandemic to ensure all patients continued to access pharmaceutical care.
methodsA three-phase explanatory mixed methods design was used: (1) a retrospective audit quantified changes to patient use of telepharmacy before (August 2019-March 2020) and during (March-September 2020) COVID-19 lockdowns; (2) process mapping to visualise and compare all the work steps involved in delivering telepharmacy and its face-to-face equivalent; (3) interviews with pharmacists (n = 10) to explain the patterns of patient use identified in the audit data and explore the impact of telepharmacy on their work.
resultsTelepharmacy occasions of service (N = 1442) increased 6-fold during COVID-19 lockdown, with a significant increase in metropolitan and express deliveries. Comparing the process maps reveals the inherent efficiencies of face-to-face care, as remote dispensing involved substantially more administrative steps than in-person encounters. Three themes emerged from the interviews that illuminate pharmacists' experience of delivering telepharmacy: increased and less satisfying work; shifting responsibility for medication management from patients to pharmacists; and questioning the cost of convenience.
conclusionsTelepharmacy successfully maintained access to pharmaceutical care for highly immunocompromised outpatients during, and long after the COVID-19 pandemic, but this came at the cost of increased administrative workload and reduced professional satisfaction for pharmacists. As telehealth becomes embedded in routine care, service models must account for these hidden workload consequences and ensure telehealth is targeted to settings where it delivers value rather than just convenience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42919261What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.