Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42919235›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2026

Prevalence, associated factors, and machine learning-based prediction of infertility among married women in North Shewa Zone, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study.

Abate Tadesse Zeleke, Tadesse Ayele Belachew, Merga Abdissa Aga, Degemu Sahlu Asebe, Rebik Shukure Beyane

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Abate Tadesse ZelekeDepartment of Statistics, Salale University, Fiche, Ethiopia.
Tadesse Ayele BelachewDepartment of Statistics, Salale University, Fiche, Ethiopia.
Merga Abdissa AgaDepartment of Statistics, Salale University, Fiche, Ethiopia. mergabdisa3@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4291-6247
Degemu Sahlu AsebeDepartment of Public Health, Salale University, Fiche, Ethiopia.
Rebik Shukure BeyaneDepartment of Public Health, Salale University, Fiche, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInfertility, defined as the inability to conceive after 12 months of regular unprotected sexual intercourse, is an important public health concern with significant social, psychological, and marital consequences. In this study, infertility was based on self-reported time to conception rather than clinical diagnosis; no clinical examination or male factor assessment was conducted, and outcome misclassification is therefore possible. Despite its importance, community-based evidence in Ethiopia remains limited. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of infertility, identify factors associated with infertility, and evaluate the predictive performance of selected machine learning models among married women in North Shewa Zone, Oromia, Ethiopia.

methodsA community-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 829 randomly selected married women from three districts. Infertility status was self-reported based on time to conception. Multivariable logistic regression with Firth penalization was used to identify factors associated with infertility, and adjusted odds ratios (AORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported. For predictive analysis, machine learning models-including Random Forest (RF), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Support Vector Machine (SVM)-were developed using an 80/20 train-test split with 5-fold cross-validation applied to the training data. Class imbalance was addressed using resampling techniques. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

resultsThe prevalence of infertility was 12.7%. Factors significantly associated with infertility included district of residence, age at marriage, irregular menstrual cycles, history of abortion, family history of infertility, number of sexual partners, cigarette smoking, and women's occupation. In predictive modelling, Random Forest achieved the highest AUC (0.89), followed by XGBoost (0.88) and SVM (0.81), compared with logistic regression (AUC = 0.69). However, differences in predictive performance were modest. Given the relatively small number of infertility events, there is potential for model instability and overfitting. Variable importance analysis from the Random Forest model identified women's occupation, education level, family history of infertility, and menstrual cycle pattern as important predictors.

conclusionInfertility among married women in North Shewa Zone is associated with multiple socio-demographic, reproductive, and behavioral factors. However, findings should be interpreted cautiously due to the cross-sectional design, self-reported outcome, absence of clinical verification, and limited number of events. Although machine learning models demonstrated relatively higher predictive performance, results are based on internal validation only and may not generalize to other populations. Logistic regression remains appropriate for inference, while machine learning approaches may be useful for exploratory prediction. Further studies with larger sample sizes, improved outcome measurement, and external validation are required before practical application.

Indexed as

Infertility, FemaleMachine LearningAdultBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsClassification AlgorithmsCross-Sectional StudiesEthiopiaFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMarriagePrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsPrevalenceRandom ForestRisk FactorsEthiopiaInfertilityLogistic regressionMachine learningRandom forestReproductive health

Identifiers

PMID42919235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.