ArticleBMC oral health2026
The role of salivary lactobacilli in early childhood caries increment.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough lactobacilli are frequently detected in children with early childhood caries (ECC), the roles of specific lactobacilli species remain unclear. Streptococcus mutans, a well-established cariogenic species, was included as a reference organism. Limosilactobacillus fermentum, Ligilactobacillus salivarius, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus were selected in the study aiming to investigate the prospective associations between lactobacilli species and caries increment based on machine learning approaches.
methodsA prospective cohort of 282 children aged 3-4 years was established in Shanghai, China. Participants received clinical examinations at baseline and 1-year follow-up. Baseline saliva samples were collected. The detection and quantification of the targeted species in salivary samples were performed by quantitative real-time PCR. Logistic regression and machine-learning analyses were conducted to evaluate associations with caries increment.
resultsL. fermentum, L. salivarius, L. rhamnosus, and S. mutans were positively correlated to caries increment. L. fermentum was highly detectable (82.6%) in the saliva and significantly correlated with S. mutans. Furthermore, positive correlations existed between L. fermentum, and L. acidophilus, L. rhamnosus and L. salivarius. The ratio of L. salivarius to S. mutans was significantly correlated to caries increment. In the logistic regression model, caries experience and high levels of caries activity test were significantly associated with caries increment, whereas the associations between salivary bacterial abundance and caries increment were no longer statistically significant after adjustment. SHAP analysis based on light gradient boosting machine identified S. mutans and L. fermentum as the top important bacterial features contributing to the prediction of caries increment.
conclusionsSalivary detection and abundance of specific lactobacilli species were prospectively associated with caries increment in preschool children. Among the species examined, L. fermentum may contribute to the overall microbial predictive profile in machine-learning models rather than acting as an independent predictor of caries increment. The observed association involving L. salivarius and S. mutans suggests a potential ecological relationship that warrants further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42919233What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.