ArticleBMC urology2026
Are parents receiving reliable information on nocturnal enuresis from YouTube?
Article in BMC urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the quality, reliability, source characteristics, and content completeness of YouTube videos related to pediatric nocturnal enuresis and to identify potential gaps in online patient education. MATERIALS AND
methodsA cross-sectional analysis of YouTube videos was conducted using the search terms "nocturnal enuresis," "bedwetting," and "child bedwetting." The first 100 eligible videos were included because they represent the content most likely to be encountered by users during routine searches. Video characteristics, including duration, views, likes, comments, uploader source, and content type, were recorded. Educational quality and reliability were assessed using the Global Quality Scale (GQS) and the modified DISCERN instrument. Content completeness was evaluated using a predefined scoring system covering definition, etiology, diagnostic evaluation, treatment options, behavioral interventions, and prognosis.
resultsA total of 100 videos were analyzed. The median video duration was 3.5 min (IQR: 2.1-9.1), and the median number of views was 1,192 (IQR: 148-4,964). The mean GQS, modified DISCERN, and content completeness scores were 3.22 ± 1.19, 2.69 ± 1.35, and 3.23 ± 1.66, respectively. Significant differences in educational quality, reliability, and content completeness were observed according to uploader source (all p < 0.001). Videos produced by healthcare professionals, academic institutions, and professional organizations generally demonstrated higher quality and more comprehensive content than commercial or non-professional sources. Definitions (78%), causes (74%), and treatment options (81%) were frequently discussed, whereas diagnostic evaluation (49%) and prognosis (38%) were substantially underrepresented. Behavioral interventions were mentioned in 67% of videos.
conclusionsYouTube videos on pediatric nocturnal enuresis demonstrate substantial variability in quality, reliability, and content completeness. Although videos originating from healthcare-related sources tended to provide more comprehensive and reliable information, important gaps remain, particularly regarding diagnostic evaluation and prognosis. These deficiencies may contribute to incomplete parental understanding and highlight the need for evidence-based digital educational resources and clinician-guided online health information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42919199What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.