ArticleBMC cancer2026
TIRELESS study protocol: non-inferiority study of nurse-led web-based cognitive behavioral therapy for cancer-related fatigue in patients with incurable cancer.
Article in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06511518 (Making Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Cancer-related Fatigue Fit for Implementation in Patients With Cancer Receiving Palliative Systemic Treatment), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Making Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Cancer-related Fatigue Fit for Implementation in Patients With Cancer Receiving Palliative Systemic Treatment
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFatigue is a prevalent and debilitating symptom for patients with incurable cancer. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) can significantly reduce cancer-related fatigue in this patient group. However, implementation of CBT into clinical care is difficult as the intervention is time-intensive, costly, and requires face-to-face consultations with a specialized CBT therapist. Since nurses already support patient with symptom management, including fatigue, internet supported CBT delivered by nurses could be a promising alternative for patients with incurable cancer. The primary aim of this study is to determine the non-inferiority of nurse-led web-based CBT in its effect on cancer-related fatigue, compared to CBT provided by CBT therapists.
methodsThe study is a prospective, non-randomized study using historical cohorts as the benchmark for comparison. Severely fatigued patients with incurable cancer of a solid tumor receive a 12-week nurse-led web-based CBT intervention. Primary and secondary outcome measures are assessed at baseline, post-intervention (14 weeks), and follow-up (26 weeks). The primary outcome measure is fatigue severity assessed with the Checklist Individual Strength (CIS-subscale fatigue severity). Secondary outcomes include functional impairment, quality of life and fatigue assessed with EORTC-QLQ-C30, and health care costs. Primary and secondary outcomes of the TIRELESS study and the benchmark are compared to determine non-inferiority. Non-inferiority of fatigue reduction is concluded if the upper bound of the one-sided 95% CI does not exceed + 5 on the CIS, with higher scores indicating more severe fatigue. In addition, interviews are conducted to gain insight in nurses' and patients' experiences with the intervention. These data are analyzed applying a thematic analysis method. Recruitment has started in June 2024. DISCUSSION: Especially for this burdened patient group, integration of CBT for fatigue in routine medical care is essential. With the TIRELESS study, we aim to reduce patient burden, foster scalability and accessibility of CBT for fatigue, and increase patients' self-management. If this approach is non-inferior to the original evidence-based (benchmark) intervention, this will enable implementation of cancer-related fatigue interventions for the growing group of patients with incurable cancer.
trial registrationNCT06511518; date of registration: 23/02/2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42919196What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.