Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42919178›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2026

Gastric microbiota‑derived postbiotics as antimicrobial and anti‑biofilm agents.

Mahmonir Azizi, Parastoo Saniee, Mohaddaseh Ramezani

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mahmonir AziziDepartment of Microbiology and Microbial Biotechnology, Faculty of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
Parastoo SanieeDepartment of Microbiology and Microbial Biotechnology, Faculty of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran. p_saniee@sbu.ac.ir.
Mohaddaseh RamezaniMicroorganisms Bank, Iranian Biological Resource Center (IBRC), ACECR, Karaj, Iran. m_ramezani@acecr.ac.ir.

Funding

National Institute of Medical Research Development (NIMAD), Tehran, Iran IR.NIMAD.REC.1398.421
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe human gastric microbiota is recognized as a diverse and metabolically active ecosystem with significant roles in health and disease. Beyond probiotics, postbiotics, non-viable microbial products with antimicrobial and anti-biofilm properties, offer stable and safer therapeutic alternatives. Rising antimicrobial resistance and biofilm associated infections caused by pathogens such as Staphylococcus aureus and Candida albicans highlight the urgent need for new strategies. Based on this evidence, the present study aimed to isolate bacterial strains from gastric biopsies of patients with gastritis, evaluate their probiotic traits with molecular confirmation, and prepare postbiotics from these strains. The antimicrobial and anti-biofilm activities of the postbiotics were then tested in vitro against S. aureus and C. albicans, two clinically relevant biofilm-forming pathogens.

resultsFrom 20 gastric biopsies, 65 isolates were recovered, mostly Gram‑positive bacilli (n = 52). β‑hemolytic strains (n = 29) were excluded, leaving 34 for probiotic screening. Nine isolates survived strongly at pH 2.5 (> 10⁶ CFU/mL), and several showed bile salt resistances with inhibition rates between 0.1 ± 0.1 and 2.4 ± 0.3. 2 isolates maintained high viable counts under simulated gastric juice at 4 h and 24 h, adhered strongly to Caco‑2 cells, and produced ammonia from L‑arginine. 16S rRNA sequencing identified one (Q3) as Lacticaseibacillus and the other (M2) as Ligilactobacillus. Both were resistant to vancomycin, ceftazidime, and amikacin. Postbiotics were prepared from extracellular and intracellular metabolites through centrifugation, filtration, lysis, and lyophilization, yielding PQ3 and PM2. MIC assays showed PQ3 inhibited S. aureus at 0.125 g/mL and C. albicans at 0.5 g/mL, while PM2 was more potent (0.0625 g/mL and 0.125 g/mL, p < 0.0001). MBC/MFC assays confirmed stronger killing by PM2, with bactericidal activity at 0.125 g/mL versus 0.25 g/mL for PQ3, and fungicidal activity at 0.5 g/mL versus 1.0 g/mL (p < 0.0001). Biofilm assays revealed PQ3 reduced S. aureus biofilms by 18-49% and C. albicans by 28-51%, whereas PM2 achieved 27-74% and 56-85% inhibition respectively (p < 0.0001).

conclusionGastric‑derived postbiotics demonstrated strong antibacterial, antifungal, and anti‑biofilm activity. These results highlight their promise for future investigation, although in vivo validation, future genomic and mechanistic studies are needed to further support the therapeutic potentials of gastric‑derived postbiotics.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsBacteriaBiofilmsProbioticsStomachBacterial AdhesionCaco-2 CellsCandida albicansDNA, BacterialGastritisHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMicrobial ViabilityMolecular Sequence DataRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAnti-Infective AgentsDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAntimicrobial activityBiofilm inhibitionGastric microbiotaPostbioticsS. aureus and C. albicans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.