ArticleBMC ophthalmology2026
Clinical characteristics and strabismus patterns in 61 patients with morning glory syndrome: a retrospective study.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo analyze the frequency, type distribution, and related clinical characteristics of strabismus in patients with morning glory syndrome, and to provide evidence for clinical evaluation and intervention.
methodsClinical data of patients with morning glory syndrome who visited our hospital between August 1, 2024 and December 31, 2025 were retrospectively analyzed. Visual acuity, refractive status, fixation ability, associated ocular abnormalities, and strabismus examination findings were collected, and statistical analyses were performed.
resultsA total of 61 patients were included, involving 67 affected eyes; 55 patients had unilateral involvement and 6 had bilateral involvement. The median age at initial presentation to our hospital for evaluation of MGS was 5 years. Refractive abnormalities were common, with anisometropia observed in 45.2% of patients. Absent fixation was observed in 42 affected eyes, accounting for 62.7% (42/67). The frequencies of cataract and retinal detachment were 39.3% and 21.3%, respectively. Among the 59 patients included in the strabismus analysis, 52 were diagnosed with strabismus, yielding a frequency of 88.1%. Because some patients had horizontal strabismus combined with vertical strabismus or dissociated vertical deviation, strabismus types were classified as non-mutually exclusive categories. Exotropia-related types were the most common, observed in 23 patients (44.2%), followed by vertical strabismus-related types in 18 patients (34.6%), esotropia-related types in 16 patients (30.8%), DVD-related types in 4 patients (7.7%), abducens nerve palsy in 3 patients (5.8%), and variable/unstable deviation in 2 patients (3.8%).Patients with esotropia-related types had binocular spherical equivalent refraction that tended to be more hyperopic than that of patients with exotropia-related types, and the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.029). Four patients underwent strabismus corrective surgery, and short-term postoperative ocular alignment improved in all cases.
conclusionPatients with morning glory syndrome have a high frequency of strabismus, with exotropia-related types being the most common and frequently present with refractive abnormalities, fixation dysfunction, and other ocular abnormalities such as cataract and retinal detachment. Clinical evaluation should emphasize ocular alignment, fixation ability, and refractive status, together with anterior segment and fundus examinations, to facilitate early identification of associated ocular abnormalities, individualized intervention, and long-term follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42919173What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.