ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2027
Protocols for Diagnosis and Management of Arthropod Bite Allergies in Humans.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2027. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Allergic diseases have increased significantly in recent decades, with a higher incidence of severe manifestations such as anaphylaxis. This increase is attributed mainly to environmental factors associated with the Western lifestyle that alter the epithelial barrier, promoting sensitization to allergens, such as those from arthropods. Hymenoptera (bees and wasps) are the most implicated arthropods. The sting introduces a venom composed of highly sensitizing proteins that are capable of triggering reactions ranging from local and mild to potentially fatal systemic reactions. The incidence is higher in rural areas, adults, and exposed professionals such as beekeepers. On the other hand, tick bites can sensitize individuals to alpha-gal, causing allergic reactions 2-6 h later. This delay in the response leads to an underdiagnosis of this allergic disease. The diagnosis is based on the clinical history and complementary tests such as skin tests, specific IgE tests, basophil activation tests, and tryptase determination, although false negatives may occur, especially after a recent reaction or in patients with mastocytosis. Treatment includes preventive measures, adrenaline for systemic reactions, and specific immunotherapy, which are effective at reducing the risk of future severe reactions and improving quality of life. Novel oral immunotherapy food could be an effective alternative in the treatment of alpha-gal allergy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42918995What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.