Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42918966›Full record

ReviewDiscover nano2026

Graphene-based nanomaterials in biosensing: current advances, challenges, and future directions for precision diagnostics.

Hamza Rafeeq, Abdul Maajid Khokhar, Rida Siddique, Muhammad Anjum Zia, Muhammad Naeem, Huanhuan Chen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Discover nano, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hamza RafeeqYunnan International Joint Laboratory with South and Southeast Asia for the Integrated Development of Animal-derived Anti-thrombosis Chinese Medicine, Qujing Normal University, Qujing, Yunnan, 655011, China. Hamza.rafeeq@riphahfsd.edu.pk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0814-7851
Abdul Maajid KhokharYunnan International Joint Laboratory with South and Southeast Asia for the Integrated Development of Animal-derived Anti-thrombosis Chinese Medicine, Qujing Normal University, Qujing, Yunnan, 655011, China.
Rida SiddiqueDepartment of Pharmacy, Riphah International University Faisalabad Campus, Faisalabad, 38000, Punjab, Pakistan.
Muhammad Anjum ZiaDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, 38000, Punjab, Pakistan.
Muhammad NaeemYunnan International Joint Laboratory with South and Southeast Asia for the Integrated Development of Animal-derived Anti-thrombosis Chinese Medicine, Qujing Normal University, Qujing, Yunnan, 655011, China.
Huanhuan ChenYunnan International Joint Laboratory with South and Southeast Asia for the Integrated Development of Animal-derived Anti-thrombosis Chinese Medicine, Qujing Normal University, Qujing, Yunnan, 655011, China. Chhuanhuan@163.com.

Funding

Huanhuan chen 202503AP140025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGraphene-based nanomaterials (GBNs), including graphene oxide, reduced graphene oxide, graphene quantum dots, and their composites, combine ultra-high surface area, superior conductivity, and tunable optical properties, making them powerful materials for ultra-sensitive biosensing. AIM AND SCOPE: Unlike earlier descriptive, platform-specific surveys, this review is organised around structure-property-performance relationships and applies a uniform critical lens to the primary literature.

methodsWe examine optical (fluorescence, surface plasmon resonance, colorimetric, SERS), electrochemical, and field-effect transistor (FET) biosensors. We compare them head-to-head on sensitivity, reproducibility, scalability, and clinical readiness. KEY

findingsGBN platforms detect pathogens such as SARS-CoV-2, cancer biomarkers, metabolites, and environmental toxins with high sensitivity and selectivity. However, many reported ultra-low detection limits are extrapolated from buffer calibrations rather than measured, and they are rarely validated in blinded clinical cohorts. Some are also physically implausible given the number of target molecules in the assay volume. CHALLENGES: Key barriers are cytotoxicity, non-specific binding, irreproducible synthesis, and regulatory validation. For FETs specifically, the main obstacles are Debye screening, baseline drift, and poor wafer-scale yield.

conclusionsAI-assisted signal processing, wearable and implantable devices, and 3D-printed multi-analyte lab-on-a-chip systems are critical future directions. Addressing these challenges through interdisciplinary effort could make GBN biosensors a foundation for personalized, point-of-care healthcare.

Indexed as

BiosensorsClinical translationGraphene-based nanomaterialsNanobiotechnologyPersonalized medicinePoint-of-care diagnosticsSurface-enhanced Raman scattering

Identifiers

PMID42918966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.