ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2026
An International Randomized Prospective Trial Comparing a Supine MRI-based Guidance System, The Breast Cancer Locator
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
51 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPositive margins after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) require additional surgery, a negative patient experience that also adds costs to care. Pilot trials indicate the Breast Cancer Locator
methodsPatients with nonpalpable, magnetic resonance imaging-visualized invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ undergoing BCS were prospectively randomized to either BCL or WL.
resultsIn total, 418 randomized patients underwent surgery. The PMR was 14.4% (30/209) in the BCL group and 21.1% (44/209) in the WL group, a relative decrease of 32%. In primary analysis, the treatment difference was -7.1% (95.4% confidence interval [CI] -14.3 to 0.1). Noninferiority was demonstrated (p = 0.011). The one-sided p-value for superiority (p = 0.025) slightly exceeded the prespecified significance level of 0.023. In prespecified analysis stratified by final tumor type, the PMR was significantly lower in the BCL group (p = 0.019). Fewer BCL patients underwent re-excision: 12.9% versus 19.6%, a relative decrease of 34%. The PMR for all tumor types was lower in the BCL group, with a > 60% relative reduction in PMR in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (20.6% vs. 53.3% [95% CI -52.1 to -9.1]) and invasive lobular carcinoma (9.1% vs. 25.6% [95% CI -32.9 to -0.2]). Adverse event rates were similar.
conclusionsBCL was noninferior to WL and superior in analysis stratified by final tumor type. Clinically meaningful relative reductions in PMR and re-excision rates were observed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42918953What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.