ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2026
Molecular tumor board in advanced sarcoma: treatment implementation and clinical outcomes in a real-world cohort.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAdvanced sarcomas remain therapeutically challenging. We evaluated treatment implementation and clinical outcomes after molecular tumor board recommendations.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 125 sarcoma patients discussed in our multidisciplinary Molecular and Familial Tumor Board between 2017 and 2023. Clinical benefit was assessed by treatment implementation and by the ratio of progression-free survival on molecularly guided therapy versus the preceding treatment line (PFS2/PFS1). Overall survival (OS) was measured from first board discussion.
resultsA total of 252 pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant records across 133 genes were identified. Molecular profiling enabled therapy recommendations in 71 of 125 patients (56.8%), with treatment implementation in 41 (32.8%). PFS2/PFS1 evaluation was feasible in 29 patients, and nine (31.0%) had a documented ratio > 1.3. Median PFS2 was 102 days (95% CI 63-233). Two of seven patients (28.6%) receiving poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor-containing regimens had ratios > 1.3. Median OS in 124 patients was 14.6 months (95% CI 11.7-18.5; global log-rank p = 0.220).
conclusionMolecular tumor board-guided therapy identified treatment options for selected sarcoma patients. Prolonged disease control in individual PARP-treated cases provides a positive signal that warrants prospective evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42918929What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.