ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026
Exploring perspectives and engagement in space surgery: a survey of SAGES members.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSAGES' space surgery task force was created in 2023 in response to the potential increased need for surgical intervention in space as humanity seeks to establish larger and more permanent populations in space environments. This task force sought to assess the needs, limitations, and anticipated challenges of surgical care in space environments and to offer leadership opportunities by surveying the SAGES membership.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey of the SAGES membership soliciting respondent's experience in aerospace medicine and related fields, as well as members' interests within space surgery and their opinions about the future surgical needs of space explorers. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize demographics, interests, and preferences, and narrative review and thematic analysis were used to analyze open-ended responses.
resultsSurvey response rate was 6.1%. Most respondents were attending minimally invasive or general surgeons. Experience was reported in telehealth, artificial intelligence, austere environment surgery, and military medicine. Greatest interest was expressed in the application of robotic technologies in space. Respondents wished to participate in technical skills workshops and to view presentations by astronauts on space medicine as part of the future activities of the task force at SAGES annual meetings. Themes identified as challenges to space surgery included microgravity, resource limitations, remote surgery, training, and specific medical concerns. Future areas of focus included technology and innovation, protocol/system design, adjustment to medical standards, and training programs.
conclusionThis survey identified a strong interest among the SAGES membership in leading the conversation surrounding space surgery as humanity expands beyond low earth orbit. Numerous opportunities, challenges, and new directions were identified by respondents that will guide the future activities of the task force.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42918913What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.