ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2026
Extremophilic and conventional PGPR consortia enhance wheat tolerance to microplastic-osmotic co-stress.
Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microplastic contamination and water limitation increasingly co-occur in agricultural systems, creating complex constraints on plant growth that may be alleviated through microbial biostimulation. This study evaluated the ability of a conventional plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium, B. subtilisubtilis RC72, and an extremophilic P. poaeoae strain, applied individually or in combination, to improve wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) performance under polypropylene microplastic and polyethylene glycol-induced osmotic stress. A controlled glasshouse experiment comprising 16 treatment combinations was used to assess plant growth, biomass allocation, root architecture, water relations, photosynthetic pigments, oxidative damage, osmolyte accumulation and antioxidant responses. Microplastic and osmotic stress reduced plant growth, biomass and physiological performance while altering root traits and increasing oxidative stress. Bacterial inoculation improved several stress-responsive traits, including biomass, pigment accumulation and root development, although oxidative responses were strongly treatment dependent; notably, the Mp + Peg + Pp + Ba treatment exhibited the highest MDA accumulation. Multivariate analyses further showed that microbial treatments associated with improved growth and pigment traits were separated from treatments characterized by stronger oxidative responses. Overall, B. subtilis and P. poae modulated wheat responses in a trait- and treatment-dependent manner, and the data did not demonstrate consistent superiority of the extremophilic strain across the measured parameters. The effectiveness of stress-adapted PGPR therefore appears to depend on bacterial identity and the specific environmental stress combination rather than on extremophilic origin alone. These findings indicate that PGPR responses under combined microplastic and osmotic stress are strongly dependent on bacterial identity and stress context, and that selection of microbial inoculants should therefore be based on treatment-specific performance rather than an assumption of universally beneficial consortium or extremophile effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42918910What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.