ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026
Implications of the 2017 change in the French death certificate for the accuracy of mortality statistics worldwide.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDifferentiating between types of deaths is crucial because it allows us to better understand and prevent them, and it is essential to bringing justice to homicide victims. While there is extensive knowledge about the ways in which identifying manner of death can go wrong, the advocated solutions of more training and resources have not been put to the test. A peculiarity of the French death investigation system, along with a change in the French death certificate in 2017 allow us to test the efficacy of more specific instructions as a type of training as a solution to inaccurate information on types of deaths.
methodsUsing nationwide French death certificates information available through the Epidemiological Center on Causes of Death (CépiDC) from 2016 until 2019, we conducted a before-and-after natural experiment to establish whether the 2017 change impacted the quality of mortality statistics in France. We ran logistic regression models on the likelihood that a medicolegal investigation was conducted, as well as on the quality of ICD codes for causes of death.
findingsThe 2017 change in the French death certificate led to a two-fold increase in medicolegal investigations as well as an almost 10% increase in the quality of ICD codes of causes of death nationwide.
interpretationThe more specific instructions provided through the changes to the French death certificate led to improved mortality statistics, thereby providing support for the hypothesis that more training increases the quality of mortality statistics. Future research should establish dose-response, as well as focusing on policy implications beyond the French context.
Identifiers
42918869What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.