Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42918858›Full record

ArticleNPP - digital psychiatry and neuroscience2026

Neural sensitivity to peer rejection predicts depressive symptoms and daily mood in adolescents.

Nayoung Kim, Isaac N Treves, Lilian Y Li, Sarah E Sarkas, Katherine Durham, David Pagliaccio, Nicholas B Allen, Stewart A Shankman, Randy P Auerbach

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in NPP - digital psychiatry and neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nayoung KimDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY, US. nayoung.kim@nyspi.columbia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-0394-0741
Isaac N TrevesDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY, US.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7802-6145
Lilian Y LiDepartment of Psychiatry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, US.
Sarah E SarkasDepartment of Psychiatry, Northwestern University, Chicago, IN, US.
Katherine DurhamDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY, US.
David PagliaccioDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY, US.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1214-1965
Nicholas B AllenDepartment of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, US.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1086-6639
Stewart A ShankmanDepartment of Psychiatry, Northwestern University, Chicago, IN, US.
Randy P AuerbachDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY, US.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2319-4744

Funding

U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) MH119771U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) MH133991
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the role of peer feedback, particularly rejection, is critical for adolescent major depressive disorder (MDD). However, the neurophysiological markers core to peer feedback, especially those that may presage risk for depression, are unclear. Adolescents (N = 179; ages 13-18; healthy controls n = 62, remitted MDD n = 80, current MDD n = 37) completed a baseline clinical assessment and a revised Chatroom Task during EEG recording, from which the P3 to peer acceptance and rejection feedback was quantified. Over 12 months, daily mood and keyboard inputs from adolescents' smartphones were passively obtained. Linear models evaluated whether the P3 difference between rejection and acceptance (ΔP3) prospectively predicted depressive severity and average daily mood. Exploratory natural language processing examined whether friendship-focused social communication moderated the association between neural sensitivity to peer feedback and subsequent clinical outcomes. Group and feedback type interacted in predicting P3 amplitude (F(2176) = 4.84, p = 0.009): adolescents with current MDD showed larger P3 amplitudes to rejection than acceptance, whereas remitted MDD showed elevated amplitudes to both feedback types relative to controls. In a general linear model adjusting for age, sex, site, and baseline depression severity, the Group × ΔP3 interaction was significant in predicting severity at follow-up (b = 0.092, p = 0.045); higher ΔP3 predicted higher follow-up severity in current MDD, but not in remitted MDD or healthy controls. Across the full sample, larger ΔP3 was associated with lower average daily mood over 12 months (b = -1.673, p = 0.045). These findings suggest that enhanced neural sensitivity to peer rejection may be deeply engrained in adolescent depression, shaping both the longitudinal course of depressive symptoms and daily mood.

Identifiers

PMID42918858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.