Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42918847›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2026

In vivo replication of a fully functional nerve net in a clonally reproducing animal.

Ehsan Sakib, Lisa-Marie Hofacker, Christopher Noack, Finn Ströbel, Christoph Giez, Jörg Wittlieb, Alexander Klimovich, Thomas C G Bosch

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ehsan Sakib *Zoological Institute, Christian-Albrechts University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-0964-0251
Lisa-Marie Hofacker *Zoological Institute, Christian-Albrechts University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-4284-1739
Christopher Noack *Zoological Institute, Christian-Albrechts University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2015-7147
Finn StröbelZoological Institute, Christian-Albrechts University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Christoph GiezZoological Institute, Christian-Albrechts University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8101-6498
Jörg WittliebZoological Institute, Christian-Albrechts University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Alexander KlimovichZoological Institute, Christian-Albrechts University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany. aklimovich@zoologie.uni-kiel.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1764-0613
Thomas C G BoschZoological Institute, Christian-Albrechts University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany. tbosch@zoologie.uni-kiel.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9488-5545

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nerve nets are considered the evolutionarily oldest form of nervous system. How such networks develop and how complex nervous systems become fully functional is largely unknown. In a phylogenetically ancient animal, the freshwater polyp Hydra, we demonstrate how a nerve net consisting of distinct neuronal populations is precisely replicated over the course of asexual proliferation by budding. During this process, precursor cells first accumulate at the site of the emerging neural network, followed by a stepwise formation of functional neural circuits composed of distinct neuronal populations. These circuits become arranged according to an accurately controlled spatiotemporal pattern and take control of behaviors independently of the existing parental network. Since similar processes also govern the formation of more complex nervous systems in other invertebrates and vertebrates, we suggest that the basic requirements for a neuronal network to replicate were already in place at the beginning of the evolution of the nervous system.

Indexed as

HydraNerve NetAnimalsBiological EvolutionNeurons

Identifiers

PMID42918847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.