Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42918820›Full record

ArticleNature plants2026

Reconstructing spore evolution recalibrates the timescale of land plant diversification.

Jack Hooper, Annabel M Worth, Charles H Wellman, James W Clark, Philip C J Donoghue

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature plants, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jack HooperBristol Palaeobiology Group, School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-4662-4686
Annabel M WorthBristol Palaeobiology Group, School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-8929-036X
Charles H WellmanSchool of Biosciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7511-0464
James W ClarkCentre for Evolution, Department of Life Sciences, University of Bath, Bath, UK. jc493@bath.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2896-1631
Philip C J DonoghueBristol Palaeobiology Group, School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. phil.donoghue@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3116-7463

Funding

RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BB/Y003624/1RCUK | Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) NE/V001639/1University of Bath Prize Fellowship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The origin and evolution of land plants precipitated fundamental changes to the Earth system and enabled the diversification of life on land. Their early evolution is documented by a rich fossil record of sporopollenin-walled spores that is difficult to interpret because the evolution of plant spore characteristics is unresolved. We employ a suite of ancestral state estimation methods to elucidate the pattern of spore character evolution among land plants. We find that the ancestral embryophyte underwent monoplastidic meiosis and produced unenveloped spores with a three-layered sporoderm. We infer that trilete spores (that developed in tetrahedral tetrads), traditionally considered a feature of vascular plants, were produced by the crown-embryophyte. We recalibrate the molecular timescale of early land plant evolution on the basis of a reinterpretation of the fossil record in this light. We find that crown-embryophytes originated in the Late Ordovician (457-450 Ma) and that both crown-tracheophytes (432-428 Ma) and crown-bryophytes (445-429 Ma) diverged in the early Silurian.

Identifiers

PMID42918820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.