ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2026
Public Awareness, Attitudes, and Practices Toward Digital Health Surveillance in Malawi: Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Digital surveillance systems are increasingly recognized as essential tools for enhancing early outbreak detection, reporting, and response, especially in low-resource settings. The COVID-19 pandemic unveiled the critical role of digital health surveillance systems in timely detection, monitoring, and responses to public health threats. However, successful implementation depends on public awareness, acceptance, and willingness to participate. Limited evidence exists on how the public perceives and interacts with digital surveillance in Malawi. Objective: The aim of the study was to assess the awareness, attitudes, and practices of adult Malawians toward digital surveillance during pandemics and epidemics. Methods: A cross-sectional quantitative study design was used. Data were collected in 10 selected districts (Chitipa, Mzimba South, Kasungu, Lilongwe, Salima, Balaka, Thyolo, Phalombe, Blantyre, and Chikwawa) of Malawi that had high and low levels of cholera and COVID-19 disease burden. The survey recruited 1174 participants who were 18 years or older at the time of data collection. Descriptive statistics were computed using R statistical software. Ethical approval was obtained from the National Health Sciences Research Committee prior to data collection. Results: A total of 1174 participants were surveyed, 65% (n=768) were female, and the mean age was 36.9 (SD 14.26) years. Only 59% (n=697) demonstrated awareness of digital surveillance systems, though 51% (n=603) had smartphones and 41% (n=477) used mobile phones. A positive attitude was observed in 89% (n=1044) of respondents, with most believing digital reporting could improve outbreak control, and 80% (n=939) were confident in privacy and data security. Practices related to digital reporting were low, with only 18% (n=211) having ever reported health symptoms through any digital platform. Conclusions: Enhancing digital health surveillance literacy, promoting inclusivity, and ensuring accountability will improve readiness for future pandemics through digital surveillance systems. Hence, there is a need for nationwide community sensitization programs to raise awareness about the benefits of digital health surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.