ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2026
Language of Toxicity: An eXplainable Artificial Intelligence Approach.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Toxicity prediction in small molecules represents a fundamental challenge in drug development and chemical safety assessment. Traditional approaches heavily rely on predefined molecular descriptors or fingerprints, potentially limiting the ability to capture complex and nonlinear structure-activity relationships. Here, we present a descriptor-free, language-inspired framework that can be applied to different toxicity prediction tasks within a unified architecture. The model proposed combines a multiscale Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) layer to capture chemical patterns at different scales and a Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) layer to capture the sequential nature of these patterns. This architecture also exploits an attention mechanism that computes attention weights across the sequence, enabling the model to focus on the most relevant molecular substructures for toxicity prediction. Toxic and nontoxic chemicals, represented by canonical SMILES, are investigated as the words of two languages which have to be discriminated; using eight different end points, the model provided an accurate description of toxicity patterns, with an average Area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.83 (min: 0.70, max: 0.94) under repeated cross-validation. The models were trained on relatively small data sets (∼1000 samples) and often strongly imbalanced, two important challenges that highlight the opportunities for future improvement; moreover, the proposed attention-based framework offers a representation of the molecular regions influencing model predictions, providing a basis for future investigations into toxicity-related structural patterns and potentially supporting hypothesis generation in drug design or drug repurposing applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.