Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42912929›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2026

AGENTi: APCI-ESI Analyte Ionization Fidelity Pre-Screening Workflow using Multimodel Inference.

Mithony Keng, Kenneth M Merz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mithony KengDepartment of Chemistry, Michigan State University, East Lansing48824, Michigan, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9850-0120
Kenneth M MerzDepartment of Chemistry, Michigan State University, East Lansing48824, Michigan, United States.

Funding

NIEHS NIH HHS 1U2CES030167-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ionization sources convert neutral analytes into ions, enabling their subsequent separation and detection by mass spectrometry. Depending on the technique, this mechanism occurs within a solution or in the gas phase. The two most common methods to generate ions are electrospray ionization (ESI) and atmospheric-pressure chemical ionization (APCI), respectively. Both ESI and APCI can generate the same resultant ion species; however, it has been shown that preferential charge sites can change in response to an ionization source environment. Therefore, an additional quality control is warranted a priori to delineate erroneous analyte identification and/or unequivocal structural assignment. For protonation, protomer fidelity can be assessed by comparing the ion-mobility collision cross section (CCS) values obtained for both ESI and APCI. In this work, we utilized proxy standards (i.e., controls) derived from the available literature to develop a proof-of-concept multimodel inference application called AGENTi to probe differences in ionization for high-throughput protomer shift exploratory analysis. AGENTi uses in sequence the TensorFlow Autoencoder anomaly detection and the YDF Gradient Boosted Tree machine learning frameworks to generate more balanced and robust anomaly scores. We found that using a multimodel screening approach can reduce false positive capture at an acceptable loss of true positives. Moreover, we expect to achieve a better recovery of true positives with an improvement on the current Gradient Boosted Tree regression model for ΔCCS prediction as more ESI-APCI dual data are obtained for training. In all, we demonstrated in this pilot study that our foundation model for a priori probing of ionization pathway fidelity is feasible and efficient with AGENTi. The AGENTi prototype application and documentation are accessible at https://github.com/mitkeng/AGENTi.

Indexed as

Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray IonizationWorkflowAtmospheric PressureAutoencoderBoosting Machine Learning Algorithms

Identifiers

PMID42912929
PMCPMC13663852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.