ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2026
Hierarchical Phase Transitions in Bayesian Flow Networks Enable Training-Free Molecular Design.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bayesian flow networks (BFNs) jointly model atomic coordinates and atom types for structure-based drug design, but their generative dynamics remain poorly understood. We show that the two channels resolve on different terms: atom types pass through a sharp commitment transition at tc1, whereas coordinate precision improves smoothly with no critical point of its own, reaching sub-Ångstrom resolution only at a stated threshold tc2. Extreme-value theory predicts the type channel's posterior half-maximum in closed form, and the predicted 1/β1 scaling holds across seven β1 values (R2 = 0.996) and over 13 points spanning three BFN architectures and two domains, though measured times run 11%-20% below the predicted absolute values. Exploiting that structure, phase-aware iterative refinement aligns three rounds to these boundaries and trains no auxiliary regressor, reward function, or property predictor. On 100 CrossDocked2020 test pockets at K = 200, it reaches a mean Vina Dock of -8.72 kcal/mol. Gradient-guided methods that need such training stay ahead by a small margin: over the 100-pocket intersection, the paired gap to MolJO (-8.98) is 0.25 kcal/mol (95% CI [-0.13, +0.60], paired Wilcoxon p = 0.022); equivalence testing at a preregistered ±0.5 kcal/mol margin does not establish equivalence within it. CByG (-9.16) leads by 0.44 kcal/mol on unpaired means. Phase-aware iteration improves the Round-1 to Round-3 mean by 1.34 kcal/mol (paired Wilcoxon p = 4.80 × 10-18, Cohen's dz = -1.59) and shifts the median by -1.44 kcal/mol, a shift Best-of-K resampling cannot produce. Paired on the pocket, an audited rerun passes every PoseBusters check 4.7 percentage points more often than MolJO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.