ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2026
AI Accelerated Chemical Screening Integrates ChemBERTa to Identify Repositionable CASP4 Inhibitors via MD Simulations and MM/PBSA Analysis.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study employed an integrated ligand-based virtual screening pipeline to identify potential CASP4 inhibitors from the DrugBank database, leveraging docking-score prioritization, SMILES-derived ChemBERTa embeddings, and key physicochemical descriptors. Building on this foundation, the workflow incorporated virtual screening, cheminformatics modeling, PK-PD evaluation, molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulations, and MM/PBSA free-energy analysis to systematically prioritize repurposed DrugBank compounds for CASP4-targeted Alzheimer's disease therapy. A Random Forest classifier trained on the hybrid ChemBERTa physicochemical feature set distinguished active from inactive compounds with ∼95% accuracy (ROC-AUC = 0.73) and achieved a ∼3.5-fold enrichment of active compounds among the top-ranked hits, while a companion Random Forest regressor, trained on the experimental pIC50 values of active compounds, ranked candidates by predicted potency. In addition, integrated cheminformatics modeling, PK-PD analysis, and molecular docking further narrowed the selection to the top five candidate compounds: DB00519, DB01068, DB06202, DB08882, and DB05316. Finally, MD simulations and MM/PBSA calculations established clear thermodynamic support for DB05316 and DB00519, whose binding free energies (-21.4 and -20.9 kcal/mol, respectively) exceeded even the reference compound donepezil, highlighting them as the most promising CASP4 inhibitors. Overall, this workflow provides an efficient and robust strategy for prioritizing repositioned DrugBank compounds as potential CASP4 inhibitors against Alzheimer's disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.