Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42912897›Full record

ReviewJournal of chemical information and modeling2026

Artificial Intelligence in the Discovery and Design of Ionic Liquids for Thermal Energy Applications.

Pawan Chhipa, Zachariah S Baird, Dinis O Abranches, Oliver Järvik

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pawan ChhipaDepartment of Energy Technology, Tallinn University of Technology, Ehitajate Tee 5, Tallinn19086, Estonia.
Zachariah S BairdDepartment of Energy Technology, Tallinn University of Technology, Ehitajate Tee 5, Tallinn19086, Estonia.ORCID 0000-0002-4327-3469
Dinis O AbranchesCICECO-Aveiro Institute of Materials, Department of Chemistry, University of Aveiro, Aveiro3810-193, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-0097-2072
Oliver JärvikDepartment of Energy Technology, Tallinn University of Technology, Ehitajate Tee 5, Tallinn19086, Estonia.ORCID 0000-0001-8530-2582

Funding

Eesti Teadusagentuur PRG1784Funda??o para a Ci?ncia e a Tecnologia LA/P/0006/2020Funda??o para a Ci?ncia e a Tecnologia UID/50011/2025Funda??o para a Ci?ncia e a Tecnologia UID/PRR/50011/2025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review addresses a critical need in the emerging intersection of digital chemistry and material properties by critically evaluating the current capabilities and future prospects of applying machine learning (ML) to ionic liquids (ILs) for thermal energy storage (TES) applications. We examine available data sets for key thermophysical properties relevant to TES, including thermal conductivity, heat capacity, density, viscosity, surface tension, melting point, enthalpy, CO2 solubility, and toxicity. Particular emphasis is placed on chemical space coverage, biases, and practical limitations. We compare different modeling approaches, spanning from conventional QSPR/QSAR and group-contribution methods to contemporary ML approaches, including kernel models, ensemble methods, graph neural networks (GNNs), and deep learning architectures. The impact of molecular representations and descriptor choices and validation strategies in determining model robustness and transferability is examined. To structure this assessment, we introduce a three-tier property-selection framework for IL-based TES and apply a six-criterion evaluation checklist consistently across all nine reviewed properties. The analysis is supported by literature-summary tables that consolidate data sets, chemical space coverage, modeling approaches, and validation practices across different property domains. Finally, we outline recommendations for data set standardization, open sharing of data and code, and the establishment of benchmark validation protocols to improve reproducibility and accelerate the discovery of ILs for TES applications.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceIonic LiquidsGraph Neural NetworksMachine LearningQuantitative Structure-Activity RelationshipThermodynamicsIonic LiquidsApplicability DomainEnthalpy of FusionIonic LiquidsMachine LearningPhase Change MaterialsThermal Energy Storage

Identifiers

PMID42912897
PMCPMC13663856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.