ArticleJAMA network open2026
Longitudinal Change in Calf Circumference and Incident Falls in Older Adults.
Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Calf circumference (CC) is a simple, noninvasive proxy for lower-limb muscle mass. However, evidence on the longitudinal association between CC change and incident falls remains scarce. Objective: To investigate whether progressive decline in CC is associated with higher odds of incident falls among community-dwelling older adults. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used data from the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey, a nationally representative prospective cohort. Participants aged 60 years or older with complete CC measurements at baseline (2018) and follow-up (2021) were included. Data were analyzed from January to March 2026. Exposures: Absolute CC change (in centimeters) and relative CC change (as a percentage) over 3 years, analyzed as continuous and categorical variables (absolute: no decrease, <3 cm, 3 to <5 cm, ≥5 cm; relative: no decrease, <10%, 10% to <20%, ≥20%). The no-decrease group, including individuals with no change and those with increased CC, served as the reference group. Main Outcomes and Measures: The outcome of interest was incident falls, self-reported during the 2021 wave. Covariates included sociodemographic characteristics, falls history, health behaviors, functional status, and chronic diseases, all assessed via standardized questionnaires and evaluation. Odds of incident fall were assessed using inverse probability weighted logistic regression to address survival bias. Results: Among 7068 participants (mean [SD] age, 79.66 [10.32] years; 3835 [54.26%] female), 1671 participants (23.64%) reported incident falls over a median (IQR) follow-up of 3.07 (2.91-3.17) years. In fully adjusted models, each 1-cm absolute decrease in CC was associated with 3.2% higher odds of fall (odds ratio [OR], 1.03; 95% CI, 1.02-1.05) and each 10% relative decrease with 10.3% higher odds (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.06-1.15). Compared with no decrease, an absolute decrease in CC of 5 cm or more was associated with 32.5% higher odds of fall (OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.10-1.60) and a relative decrease of 20% or more with 48.1% higher odds (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.20-1.84). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of older adults, longitudinal decreases in CC, both absolute and relative, were associated with higher odds of incident falls. Monitoring CC change over time may serve as a practical, low-cost measure to support fall risk assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.