ArticleRevista brasileira de enfermagem2026
Low-cost simulator for teaching medication administration to infants: a methodological study.
Article in Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesto develop and validate a low-cost, low-tech simulator for teaching medication administration to infants.
methodsa methodological study, with a quantitative approach, conducted in September 2023. In the first phase, a low-cost simulator was planned. In the second, it was developed using accessible materials. Finally, its appearance and functionality were validated by nine judges. Data were analyzed using the Kappa coefficient, the Content Validity Index (CVI), and the Factorial Validity Index (FVI).
resultsa high degree of agreement was achieved among experts, with a Kappa coefficient of 0.99. The CVI was equal to 1 for 96% of the items analyzed, and the FVI indicated a mean acceptance rate of 99%.
conclusionsthe developed simulator proved to be an innovative, reproducible, and low-cost educational technology, representing a more accessible alternative compared to models available on the market.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.