ArticleRevista brasileira de enfermagem2026
SBAR checklist for the transition of care in nursing in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.
Article in Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo build and validate an instrument based on the SBAR mnemonic for the transition of care in Pediatric Intensive Care Units.
methodA methodological study based on Pasquali's framework, developed in three poles (theoretical, empirical, and analytical). Items were drafted via a scoping review (PRISMA-ScR). The instrument underwent content and face validation by 15 experts and semantic analysis by three nursing residents. Agreement was estimated using the CVI and Kappa coefficient (> 0.70).
resultsThe final version was consolidated into five domains (Identification, Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation) and 41 items. All items presented CVI and Kappa values above 0.70. Semantic analysis confirmed adequate understanding without the need for further adjustments.
conclusionThe instrument proved to be valid and applicable, constituting an assistive technology capable of standardizing communication and increasing pediatric patient safety during the handover of information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.