ArticleRevista brasileira de enfermagem2026
Cultural adaptation of the Brazilian version of the New Scale of Sexual Satisfaction (NSSS-BR) for sexuality and HIV.
Article in Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo translate and cross-culturally adapt the New Scale of Sexual Satisfaction (NSSS-BR) into Brazilian Portuguese for people living with HIV (PLHIV).
methodsThis was a five-stage methodological study: translation, expert review, back-translation, semantic analysis, and pre-testing. The sample included 10 raters, 43 PLHIV in the test, and 40 in the pretest, conducted between November and December 2023 at a nursing school and a specialized HIV/AIDS service in São Paulo. Inclusion criteria varied by stage and included clinical experience, scientific publications, language proficiency, legal age, and ongoing clinical care. Data were collected via REDCap® and analyzed using SPSS®.
resultsThe Content Validity Index (CVI) was satisfactory: Individual CVI ranging from 0.87 to 0.99, and Global CVI of 0.90. Most participants considered the scale understandable and appropriate.
conclusionThe Brazilian version has been adapted, is understandable, and is culturally equivalent to the original.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.