ArticleBrazilian oral research2026
Solubility of calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers in acidic and neutral pH using phosphate-free buffers.
Article in Brazilian oral research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the solubility of calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers under acidic and neutral pH conditions using phosphate-free buffered solutions. The solubility of three calcium silicate-based sealers (BioRoot RCS, Bio-C Sealer, and AH Plus Bioceramic) and an epoxy resin-based sealer (AH Plus Jet) was evaluated according to ISO 6876:2012 guidelines, with modifications. Specimens (n = 12 per sealer) were immersed in phosphate-free buffered solutions at pH 5 and 7 and stored at 37°C for 24 hours, 7 days, and 30 days. Solubility was calculated as the percentage of initial mass loss. Statistical analyses were conducted using one-way ANOVA, Tukey's post hoc test, and independent t-tests (p < 0.05). AH Plus Jet met ISO 6876:2012 solubility standards at all time points, while all calcium silicate-based sealers exceeded the acceptable limit. Acidic pH significantly increased the solubility of these sealers (p < 0.05), except for BioRoot RCS at 30 days. Among the calcium silicate-based sealers, BioRoot RCS exhibited the lowest solubility, followed by Bio-C Sealer, whereas AH Plus Bioceramic showed the highest solubility and disintegrated after 7 days, preventing evaluation at 30 days. In contrast, AH Plus Jet remained stable under both pH conditions, exhibiting a slight mass gain over time. Overall, acidic pH increased the solubility of calcium silicate-based sealers, whereas AH Plus Jet remained stable and compliant with ISO 6876:2012 standards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.