ArticleRevista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical2026
Financial toxicity and the economic burden of Chagas disease: a scoping review.
Article in Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This scoping review mapped, synthesized, and critically analyzed the evidence on financial toxicity in Chagas disease, focusing on its determinants, impacts, and management strategies. Financial toxicity refers to the financial burden and distress experienced by individuals and their families as a result of healthcare expenses. The review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Comprehensive searches were conducted across seven electronic databases and the gray literature. Studies were selected and data extracted independently using the population-exposure-outcome framework, and 14 studies included. Most studies described indicators of the economic burden of Chagas disease rather than directly measuring patient-level financial toxicity. Substantial indirect costs were associated with absenteeism, productivity loss, and premature mortality, accounting for 44% to 75% of total costs. The findings also indicated that financial hardship may be intensified by structural vulnerabilities, including extreme poverty, lack of health insurance, and precarious migration status. Available evidence suggests that individuals affected by Chagas disease are at increased risk of healthcare-related financial hardship. However, studies directly assessing financial toxicity are scarce, with most relying on indirect economic indicators. This highlights an important gap in the literature and underscores the need for validated measures to evaluate financial toxicity in this population. Interventions that reduce financial barriers and strengthen access to healthcare services may help mitigate the economic consequences of Chagas disease. Future research should prioritize patient-centered assessments of financial toxicity to better inform policies and strategies aimed at reducing the financial burden associated with the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.