Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42912064›Full record

ArticleRevista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo2026

Development and validation of a health education e-book on scoliosis for adolescents.

Beatriz Dos Santos Oliveira, Ana Paula Oliveira Carnevalli de Miranda, Sílvia Maria Amado João, Patrícia Jundi Penha

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Beatriz Dos Santos OliveiraPontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-6898-7276
Ana Paula Oliveira Carnevalli de MirandaUniversidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5889-4770
Sílvia Maria Amado JoãoUniversidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7999-6589
Patrícia Jundi PenhaPontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0491-0418

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe the development and validation of a health education e-book for adolescents on adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

methodsA methodological study divided into three phases: bibliographic survey and interviews for content analysis; development; and validation of the e-book by 36 adolescents (18 in each group: with and without adolescent idiopathic scoliosis). The e-book was validated using a questionnaire assessing four domains: comprehension and language, structure and illustration, reading motivation, and relevance. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed, and an agreement rate of 85% or higher was considered indicative of adequate e-book evaluation.

resultsThe e-book "Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: What is it and how to treat it?" is digital, has 20 pages in the A5 half-page format, and was organized into topics. It is available for free. The domains assessed and the agreement percentages across the groups with and without adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, respectively, were text and language comprehension (92.1% and 100%), structure and illustrations (100% and 98.1%), motivation for reading (100% and 88.9%), and relevance (96.3% and 100%). Agreement was higher than 85% for all the domains assessed, showing a positive assessment.

conclusionsThe health education e-book for adolescents on adolescent idiopathic scoliosis was considered valid.

Indexed as

Health EducationPatient Education as TopicScoliosisAdolescentComprehensionFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID42912064
PMCPMC13682714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.