ArticleMemorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz2026
Application of image analysis in the evaluation of blood feeding by Lutzomyia longipalpis using an artificial feeding system with synthetic membranes.
Article in Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBlood feeding is essential for the maintenance of laboratory colonies and for experimental studies involving sand fly-parasite interactions. However, artificial feeding systems for Lutzomyia longipalpis, the principal vector of Leishmania infantum, the etiological agent of visceral leishmaniasis in the Americas, remain limited by low engorgement rates and methodological constraints in blood meal quantification.
objectivesThis study evaluated the feeding performance of Lu. longipalpis on different membranes in an artificial feeder and applied an image-based approach to quantify blood meal size.
methodsFemales were fed either on anaesthetised hamsters (in vivo control) or using a Hemotek® artificial feeder equipped with chick skin (CHK), hydrated collagen membrane treated with plasma gel (COL+PG), or untreated hydrated collagen membrane (COL). Blood meal size was estimated through digital image analysis in Fiji/ImageJ using two regions of interest: whole abdomen area (AbdA) and red-coloured blood area (BldA).
findingsFeeding rates were highest on live hosts (88.75%), followed by CHK (72.34%) and COL+PG (72.08%), whereas COL yielded significantly lower engorgement (54.67%). Although abdominal area was greater in females fed on hamsters, no significant differences in red-coloured area were detected among artificial membrane treatments. A strong positive correlation was observed between AbdA and BldA measurements (R² = 0.85), validating the image-based method. The use of plasma-treated collagen membranes achieved feeding rates comparable to CHK and was fully compatible with semi-automated image analysis. MAIN
conclusionsThese findings demonstrate that hydrated collagen membranes treated with plasma gel constitute a viable and ethically preferable alternative to bird-derived membranes for the artificial feeding of Lu. longipalpis, while image analysis provides a precise, reproducible, and practical method for blood meal quantification. Collectively, this approach refines laboratory experiments Lu. longipalpis and enhances methodological reliability in studies of sand fly biology and vector-parasite interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.