ArticleCadernos de saude publica2026
[Inconsistent condom use with regular and casual partners among men who have sex with men in Brazil: a respondent-driven sampling study].
Article in Cadernos de saude publica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We aimed to analyze the factors associated with inconsistent condom use among men who have sex with men (MSM) in Brazil. This cross-sectional study was carried out with adult MSM, recruited via respondent-driven sampling in 12 Brazilian capitals in 2016. Inconsistent condom use was measured by insertive and receptive anal intercourse in the previous six months and in the last sexual intercourse. The association between the independent variables and inconsistent condom use was measured using Poisson regression with robust variance and the estimation of adjusted prevalence ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Almost 75% of participants showed inconsistent condom use (46.2% with regular and casual partners, 23.1% only with regular partners, and 8.8% only with casual partners). In all analyses, inconsistent condom use prevalence was higher in younger MSM (< 25 years), in those who accept to have sex without condoms and who trusted their partners, and in those that used no condoms in their first sexual relation. Health actions to promote condom use in MSM should consider generational and behavioral aspects. Condom use should be encouraged in younger MSM and in relationships with trusting partners as these relationships also carry infection risk. The use of condoms must be fostered with other strategies, promoting combined HIV prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.