Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42912027›Full record

ArticleArquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery2026

Early surgery for strangulated and non-strangulated small bowel obstruction has no advantages over delayed procedure, especially in elderly patients: results of a multicenter retrospective cohort study.

Alexander Tyagunov, Anton Tyagunov, Taras Nechay, Kirill Melnikov-Makarchuk, Zaripat Alieva, Botan Abdulkarim, Alexander Sazhin

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alexander TyagunovPirogov Medical University, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Surgery - Moscow, Russia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0558-4079
Anton TyagunovPirogov Medical University, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Surgery - Moscow, Russia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2953-3404
Taras NechayPirogov Medical University, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Surgery - Moscow, Russia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0769-5282
Kirill Melnikov-MakarchukPirogov Medical University, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Surgery - Moscow, Russia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1678-413X
Zaripat AlievaPirogov Medical University, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Surgery - Moscow, Russia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-1503-8134
Botan AbdulkarimPirogov Medical University, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Surgery - Moscow, Russia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-0117-2108
Alexander SazhinPirogov Medical University, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Surgery - Moscow, Russia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6188-6093

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdhesive small bowel obstruction (SBO) can be managed surgically or non-operatively. However, there are still no well-established criteria for defining the optimal treatment strategy. Recent evidence suggests that early intervention within 24 hours of admission to hospital may benefit patients.

methodsThis was a multicenter retrospective study of adhesive SBO investigating the outcomes of early surgery (<12 hours), delayed surgery, and nonoperative treatment in 143 patients. In addition, the impact of time to surgery was also assessed in cases of strangulated and non-strangulated SBO.

resultsSixty-six (46.2%) patients underwent surgery, which was initiated laparoscopically in 49 (74.2%) cases. Of them, 36 (54.5%) patients were operated on within 12 hours of admission, and another 30 (45.5%) after 12 hours. The remaining 77 (53.5%) patients were successfully treated nonoperatively. In-hospital mortality was 7%, and all deaths (n=10; mean age 75.4 years, standard deviation±13.1 years) occurred postoperatively. Time from admission to surgery was not associated with mortality from any type of obstruction (strangulated or non-strangulated). Mortality was higher among older patients (>75 years) with non-strangulated SBO (p=0.01).

conclusionsThe surgery performed in the first 12 hours of admission, whether for strangulated or non-strangulated adhesive SBO, did not show advantages over delayed surgery. A less aggressive approach to the treatment of older or frail patients would be a wiser option.

Indexed as

Intestinal ObstructionIntestine, SmallAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsTreatment Delay

Identifiers

PMID42912027
PMCPMC13652511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.