ArticlePloS one2026
Controlled numerical generation and reconstruction of off-axis digital holograms with object-specific frequency-domain filtering.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep-learning-based holographic reconstruction requires numerical data with reliable ground truth for training and quantitative evaluation. Experimental hologram acquisition and pixel-level phase annotation can be difficult to control, making physically defined numerical cases useful as reproducible benchmarks. Here, three analytically specified phase targets-a smooth Gaussian distribution, a four-level step distribution, and a radially structured Siemens Star-are used to generate off-axis digital holograms with known phase ground truth. A frequency-domain filtering procedure is applied before inverse Fourier reconstruction, followed by DCT-based global phase unwrapping. Reconstruction quality is quantified using root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), correlation coefficient, and profile-based error analysis. The results show that reconstruction errors are comparatively small in smooth regions and increase near abrupt or high-spatial-frequency phase transitions. The three cases are therefore presented as controlled benchmark examples for algorithm verification and baseline comparison, not as a complete substitute for experimental holographic datasets or as a complete training corpus for deep-learning models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.